EI has fast review times and publication cycle for EI papers on mechanical subjects.

Fast review, publication cycle of mechanical papers, regular publication of journal papers, reliable and fast publication of source journals, journals, search publication, regular issue, search publication, impact factor query, North and South core journals, domestic and foreign general journals. For consultation, call Editor Yang
From the beginning of paper statistics until today, when publishing statistical results, we attribute each article/paper to the institution of the first author. Why do we do this? There are the following main reasons
. Only in this way can we ensure that the sum of local statistics is equal to the total. That is to say, the sum of articles published by all institutions is equal to the total number of articles published nationwide, the sum of articles published by all provinces is equal to the total number of articles published nationwide, the sum of the total number of articles published by all disciplines is equal to the total number of articles published nationwide, etc.
There are more and more co-authors/papers , for example, huge co-authors/papers with more than one author have been published, and papers co-authored by hundreds or thousands of people are also commonplace. If all authors are counted (regardless of their ranking), it means that one co-author/paper may need to process information on hundreds or thousands of authors’ institutions, regions, and countries. The workload is too large and the efficiency is Not big.
.The purpose of our institute/paper statistics work is to obtain and clean macro- and meso-level data to serve scientific research managers at the national, provincial, municipal, and institutional levels. We do not intend to use these data to evaluate individual performance. . Actual data shows that for institutional evaluation, counting first author, corresponding author or full author (regardless of the ranking) has little impact on ranking.
. Counting the first author is an easy-to-operate and simple principle. If it is changed to counting the corresponding author, then if the corresponding author is not marked in the original text, the database producer will default to the first author as the corresponding author. . In other words, in the latter case, the first author is mixed into the corresponding author, and the statistical principles are confused.
Paper publication strategy
/ Paper reviewers often provide opinions on the points discussed. This requires careful consideration to decide whether to adopt the changes. /After all, the author of the paper has practiced and thought about his work for a long time, and gradually formed his opinions. It should be said that these views are quite well founded. As long as what you say is reasonable and well-founded, you can explain the reviewer's opinions and retain your own opinions. But sometimes the author of the paper is in a corner, and his ideas become more and more confusing. / It is also the case that a paper reviewer looks at the paper from a higher perspective and points out the problems in the paper's arguments and viewpoints. At this time, the author of the paper should seriously think about the essence of the opinion, adjust his thinking, deliberate over and over again, and decide what to choose. He is neither stubborn nor bent to suit his own opinions. With an attitude of exploring the truth, communicate with each other and improve together.
/The paper has passed the review, some comments are not serious, and it can be published with minor modifications. Some require major changes before they can be published. Some papers even think that the basic facts are unreliable or the basic ideas are wrong and cannot be published. /The author of the paper should calmly analyze these opinions and handle them appropriately. Everything should be done in a scientific and realistic manner. If you confirm that the results and opinions are correct, you can submit the paper to another journal after it is rejected. You cannot submit two drafts at the same time. In the end, if it doesn't work, just ask a specialized company to do a polished translation. Those companies are all for this supper and nothing else, and they are definitely better than you. There are many such companies now, and they all do and publish articles. Naturally It's not much different, and there's nothing we can do about it. Some people who have professional titles, master's or doctorate degrees, are required to meet the required number of published papers, and many find companies to do the polishing.