- 1:
- 2
- 2:
- 2
- 3:
- 3
< rn: ; n: ; -: %; r: b; n-: ; rb(, , ); n-: 'rn n B', 'r ', r, nr; ; n -: .; ; bn: brr-b !<>>rn; rr: br-r !<>>rn;">rn: ; n: ; -: %; bn: brr-b !< >>rn; rr: br-r !<>>rn;">rn: ; n: ; -: %; bn: brr-b !<>>rn; rr: br-r ! <>>rn; rb(, , ); ;">.New resources
rn: ; n: ; -: %; bn: brr-b !<>>rn; rr: br-r !<>>rn; rb(, , ); ;">: Data is the first time that humans have created their own energy, and the more data is used, the more valuable it becomes.
rn: ; n: ; -: %; bn: brr-b !<>>rn; rr: br-r !<>>rn; rb(, , ); ;">Jack Ma It is said that it will have a huge impact on all walks of life and become the key to determining future success or failure. What do the real manufacturing giants think of Jack Ma’s five new arguments?
rn: ; n: ; -: % ; bn: brr-b !<>>rn; rr: br-r !<>>rn; rb(, , ); ;">Ma Yun said that it will truly impact traditional business, employment, and tradition. What has impacted traditional industries is not e-commerce, but our yesterday’s thoughts, our ignorance and lack of acceptance of the future
rn: ; n: ; -: %; bn: brr-b !<> >rn; rr: br-r !<>>rn; rb(, , ); ;">n-: 'rn n B', 'r ', r, nr; n-: .;">for What do the big guys in the physical manufacturing industry think of Jack Ma’s five new arguments?
rb(, , ); n-: 'rn n B', 'r ', r, nr; ; n-: .;">A few days ago, in the CCTV "Dialogue" program, the founder of Wahaha Group Zong Qinghou, chairman of the board of directors, blasted Jack Ma:
rn: ; n: ; -: %; rb(, , ); n-: 'rn n B', 'r ', r, nr; ; n -: .; bn: brr-b !<>>rn; rr: br-r !<>>rn;">rn: ; n: ; -: %; bn: brr-b !<> >rn; rr: br-r !<>>rn;">I think except for new technologies, everything else is nonsense.
rn: ; n: ; -: % ; rb(, , ); n-: 'rn n B', 'r ', r, nr; ; n-: .; bn: brr-b !<>>rn; rr: br-r !< >>rn;">rn: ; n: ; -: %; bn: brr-b !<>>rn; rr: br-r !<>>rn; rb(, , ); ;">Zong Qinghou said,
rn: ; n: ; -: %; n-: 'rn n B', 'r ', r, nr; n-: .; rb( , , ); ; bn: brr-b !<>>rn; rr: br-r !<>>rn;">New manufacturing, he (Jack Ma) himself is not (engaged in) manufacturing anything in the real economy Something. If it is a new technology, I think that the real economy is indeed pursuing new technologies to improve our manufacturing industry and move from low-end to high-end manufacturing.
rb(, , ); n-: 'rn n B', 'r ', r, nr; ; n-: .; rn: ; n: ; -: %; bn: brr-b !< >>rn; rr: br-r !<>>rn;">rn: ; n: ; -: %; bn: brr-b !<>>rn; rr: br-r ! <>>rn; rb(, , ); ;">Chairman Li Dongsheng said,
n-: 'rn n B', 'r ', r, nr; n-: .; rn: ; n: ; -: %; rb(, , ); ; bn: brr-b !<>>rn; rr: br-r !<>>rn;">In fact, it is true Except for the new technology, which I agree with, I don’t quite understand the other ones. I dare not call him nonsense like Mr. Zong does, because most of his new technologies seem to be based on his business model. It is tailor-made. He hopes that the future business environment will be like this. But for industry and the real economy, is this the most suitable? Indeed, we cannot simply use so many new technologies in this way. I think the new must be good.
n-: 'rn n B', 'r ', r, nr; n-: .; rn: ; n: ; -: %; rb(, , ); ; bn : brr-b !<>>rn; rr: br-r !<>>rn;">Zong Zong’s expression just now was actually very exciting from the bottom of his heart. He was telling the truth. In fact, we feel that the new technologies we just talked about, because our technology is constantly innovating, please remove the new words, are all the original ones, and they all exist. It’s just that when we talk about progress, it is a manifestation of an era, and it has no special importance.