What are the expectations to be achieved in ISO9001:2015?

What are the expectations that Shenzhen Ruiding Enterprise Management Consulting Co., Ltd. needs to achieve
Since the formulation, application (use) implementation and certification of standards involve the participation of all relevant stakeholders and their respective positions and concerns for realizing their core values the key of. The members of the technical committee that formulated the standard are not only from each member country, but also the members of the project working group are also composed of representatives of stakeholders related to the standard to discuss the formulation or modification of new standards. They will express comprehensive views on behalf of stakeholders in each country.
Taking the UK as an example, it not only actively participated in the revision of the edition but also strived to play a leading role.
The United Kingdom began to implement quality assurance system certification standards many years ago, which was based on this blueprint. Therefore, the United Kingdom has long been in a leading position in standard implementation and certification. History shows that as early as 2000, the quality and quantity of its certificates were ranked first in the world for consecutive years. After 2000, the first place in quantity was replaced by China, but it still enjoys strong certification strength and the right to formulate standards. In this version of the standard revision, the former still organizes forces to actively participate in the standard formulation work and calls on and mobilizes the majority of quality workers to pay attention to the development trend of the new standard and express their personal opinions in order to strive for the standard to be beneficial to the development and implementation of the country, while the latter is not as involved as The former can only be regarded as a certification power rather than a certification power.
First of all, relevant British agencies pay close attention to the revision trends and core values of the standards. After receiving the discussion draft, the Chartered Institute of Quality Management immediately organized experts and scholars from all aspects of quality management to listen to their opinions and expectations on the revision of the standard to reflect what goals the new version of the standard should achieve. So what exactly are their pursuits and expectations?
The stakeholder representatives of the standard setters have put forward different opinions from the perspective of users, including community intermediary consulting organizations and certification bodies, and from the perspective of standard formulation. In summary, the representative views are
Chairman Ni Guofu ( ) believes that in order to adapt to the next year, it is necessary to fully introduce risk-based thinking to focus more on achieving the conformity of goods and services and to be better consistent with the actual situation of other management systems of the company and the friendly words of users.
International Quality Resources (Inc.) Vice President of Operations Christopher Paris ( ) believes that the new revised version will herald the end of the current version of multiple quality management system standards and second-party audits in due course and is the post-era Start.
Mike James ( ), director of the Management Department of Lloyd's Register Quality Assurance Company and chairman of the independent international certification organization ( / Service quality comprehensively improves the accountability of certification and accreditation agencies.
Chairman and Secretary-General of the Chartered Institute of Quality Standards Professional Group and British Representative Colin Muckney ( ) believes that implementation and review personnel will come to the crossroads of Damascus this year. The path they choose will depend on international standards and accredited certifications for sustainable management systems.
Anne Hayes, head of quality assurance market development at the British Standards Institution (BSI), said the response to the draft committee had been overwhelming from the UK Department of Industry. The occurrence of major reviews will reflect current business technology developments and the needs of small and medium-sized enterprises, and changes in standards will clearly show its forward-looking nature.